全部

1·Thus individual preference may be followed in choice of immobilisation method.

因此应对病人采用个体化的制动方式选择。

2·Limb immobilisation led to more cautious rural and urban driving, with less adjustment of speed and lateral road position than when unrestricted.

与自由驾驶相比，上肢制动使得乡村和城市路段上的驾驶过程更加小心，对于速度和横向移位的调整能力减弱。

3·Upper-limb immobilisation appears to have little effect on the ability to drive a car unchallenged, but to adversely affect responses to routine hazards.

上肢制动似乎对普通情况下的驾驶过程影响不大，而对常见危险状况下的反应能力却有着明显不利的影响。

4·However when responding to hazards immobilisation caused less safe driving, with higher speeds, a greater proximity to the hazard before action was taken and less steering adjustment.

然而当遭遇危险情况时，制动会降低驾驶安全性，因其驾驶速度较快，采取行动前距离危险更近，调整能力也较弱。